Thanks to Charlie Horse 47 and Killdumpster for their sponsorship of this post, via the magic of Patreon.
***
 |
| Image by Tumisu from Pixabay |
Splish splash splish splash splish splash splosh!
Sploom.
Is that the sound of a hideous fiend approaching us from the neighbouring swamp?
I suspect it's not.
I suspect it's the sound of the internet's most talked about feature approaching, because it seems that that's the sound it makes.
I am, indubitably, referring to the feature in which only You the Reader may choose the night's topic for debate.
But what will it be?
I cannot say.
Therefore, feel free to post it in the comments section below and let us hope the gators don't get us.
Charlie just read a new, most-excellent graphic novel: “Dr Wethless”. It is about Dr. Wertham who worked tirelessly to reduce the comic book industry in the US to purely funny books (and maybe even eliminate them) in the 1950s.
ReplyDeleteOpinions on Wortham’s activities?
As an aside, the guy was a humanitarian as well, being instrumental in overturning “separate but equal “ laws in the US school system in the 1950s.
And of course if anyone elae has subjects please post!
I’ll look that up, Charlie - thanks!
ReplyDeleteI have a vanilla comics question…
What comic artists were you once blazingly enthusiastic about but aren’t any more? Why - and when did the change take place?
Conversely, anyone you weren’t keen on but have come to appreciate? And why / when?
Charlie - Regarding comics, funny or serious is a false alternative ( regarding some titles), suggesting the geezer's comics knowledge is superficial. Peanuts is both funny & serious. Spidey makes jokes about "losing face", whilst tearing off a samurai warrior's mask. There's also Howard the Duck...
ReplyDeletePhillip
Matthew - I think my art prejudices have remained the same, but I'll have to mull over it!
ReplyDeletePhillip
MM - good one. I am too old and not current to answer this in the present tense.
ReplyDeleteI can say that I am more tolerant of Fr@nk R@bbins art though after reading copies od Shadow and Invaders to keep up with SDC.
Also I appreciate Gil Kane’s little run on Spidey in the early 1970s now. Prior to that, his work on Atom, Green Lantern was nice but boring. After that, he became ubiquitous and predictable.
But his Spidey’s around ASM 100 are a delight! Again I owe this to SDC, digging books out of the long boxes covered in 40 -50 years of dust.
And I still have a slavish devotion to Kirby, Steranko, Colan, Everett, John Buscema. And Aparo and Kubert.
Wertham was after elimanating violence and racism and misogyny in all forms in comics, whether Road Runner and Wiley Coyote or Vault of Horror or Charlie Brown os Spidey variants. Hope that helps. CH
ReplyDeleteI used to love Mike Grells art in the 1970s ( especially Legion of Superheroes) and although I still like some of his early work, I really found his style tedious from Green Lantern, Jon Sable etc onwards .
ReplyDeleteI hated Frank Robbins art especially his Cap America and Morbius strips at Marvel, but from around the late1970s I started to appreciate his stuff ( even Cap America). The guys was a genius just check those Shadow issues at DC....ok, I'll get my coat! .
I don't think Dr Wretham was wrong to raise the issue of violence in comics, perhaps the way he went around it was a bit blunt. Although I have to say I have only read anti Wretham articles, if he was trying to eliminate racism etc then I can't see that was wrong
Charlie and Matthew, thanks for the topics.
ReplyDeleteI know little of Dr Wertham but have always felt he was a strange man.
I really didn't like Jack Kirby's 1960s super-hero work, when I was a youth but am fully appreciative of it, as an adult.
I didn't know Dr Wertham was opposed to racism and misogyny. I'd always assumed he was a typical meddling narrow-minded social-conservative, telling other people how to live while bleating about "freedom".
ReplyDeleteOn the subject of art, as a kid I thought Jack Kirby could do no wrong but nowadays I'm a bit more critical. By contrast I didn't like Pablo Marcos but I've come to appreciate him, especially all his Marvel UK covers from 1974-78.
I was a huge Neal Adams’ fan in the mid 80’s (probably when a lot of his 70’s work was being reprinted on glorious baxter paper). Nowadays, I find his stuff pretty meh. I think this may be partially due to having been burned several times with his Continuity Studio titles. Conversely, my appreciation for Steranko has gotten, if anything, greater, over the years.
ReplyDeleteDW
Dr. Fredric Wertham was born in Germany and eventually immigrated to the USA. His personal papers and documents may be seen in the US Library of Congress. This includes a letter from Thurgood Marshall personally thanking him for his work studying discrimination.
ReplyDeleteBelow, Charlie lifts from google.
"In order to prepare for discrimination cases in Delaware, attorneys Louis Redding, Jack Greenberg, and Thurgood Marshall needed medical testimony on the harm segregation caused children. Wertham's studies showed that the practice of racial separation "creates a mental health problem in many Negro children with a resulting impediment in their educational progress." Wertham's testimony was significant because his research was the first to examine both black and white children attending segregated schools. The evidence revealed the possibly that white children, too, may be harmed by school segregation. The Delaware cases became part of the legal argument used in the landmark school desegregation case, Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954)."
Wertham gathered this data while operating a free mental health clinic in Harlem for poor people. Named in memory of Karl Marx's son-in-law, Dr. Paul Lefargue, the Lafargue Clinic became one of the most noteworthy institutions to serve poor Americans and to promote the cause of civil rights.
I do recommend the graphic novel Dr. Werthless but be warrned: Wertham did extensive work providing therapy and studying sociopaths in the prison system of NY. The details and supporting footnotes are gruesome to the extreme. Perhaps this serves as the foundation for his pursuit of comics.
Jim Starlin was great up to the end of the Warlock series - but The Death Of Captain Marvel and all that Metamorphosis/Dreadstar biz since was awful. The review in The Comics Journal nailed it - something along the lines of "It's as if Starlin decided to finally look at an anatomy book and adjust his style accordingly"...to his detriment, in my opinion.
ReplyDeleteAnd I'm in accord with DW - Neal Adams could do no wrong until he started doing his own thing with his Continuity Comics...most of his innovative layouts disappeared in favour of over-rendering - and I challenge anyone who says Jack Kirby was a terrible writer to try ploughing their way through that Batman:Odyssey mishmash!
While I'm at it, Dave Cockrum was never the same after he came back to the X-Men after Byrne - in fact, Byrne's work seemed to get lazier (if that's the word) once he took the Fantastic Four on.
What the heck, in for a penny - George Perez was a talent for sure, when he began; you could see his work improving issue by issue in the Avengers, and his own FF art was exemplary. By time he started on the Teen Titans, he was topsa, but by time he finished...hmm.
And for what it's worth, I liked Barry's work best when he was plain old Mr Smith, and yet to pick up the Windsor.
As a Neal Adams fan(atic) sadly I would have to agree that his writing was just terrible . His Continuity output and later art was a real disappointment , the stuff of bargain bins. But at his peak his art was the stuff of comic book legend.
ReplyDeleteI would agree with B Smith...Starlin's stuff after those two Marvel annuals didn't really grab me very much,
ReplyDeleteI've been rereading Kirby's Kamandi, of all things, and I love it. I dunno why. I know some people don't like his dialogue, it may seem dated but I find it charming.
Back when I was little M.P. when I was five or so, my Ma (who used to buy me comics) bought me a copy of Kamandi where he and a couple other characters end up in a Soviet satelite and have to deal with a mutated cosmonaut.
Spooked me good! Then she bought me a copy of Amazing Spider-Man 150. They were in grocery stores back then. I was hooked for good!
Still am! A comics fan for fifty years plus,
M.P.
B's artists - spot on! An Avengers (mid 2000s?) my brother bought, with Perez brought back, piqued my interest. However, Thor's cutesy ski-slope nose totally put me off! Nothing like Perez's brilliance during Jim Shooter's Avengers. Nor in possibly Perez's peak month, cover dated June 1980
ReplyDelete( Taskmaster Avengers, & MTIO Thing & Stingray.) Nevertheless, our art preferences haven't changed - it's the artwork that's deteriorated ( to be pedantic! )
Fast production's vital for artists, on monthly titles. Cockrum's covers (with Austin) were brilliant - e.g. Iron Man # 106 ( incidentally, Cockrum's Iron Man in the Vietnam Avengers was fab, too.) Likewise, that George Tuska counterpart's tale (Tuska's Captain Marvel vs Nitro) showcased a Cockrum & Austin end page is brilliant, too! In both cases, Cockrum wasn't rushing for a deadline ( I imagine), so delivered brilliant results. Again, however, our views of his art haven't changed over time - it's just some art's better than others.
What can I say about Starlin? B's nailed it again!
Phillip
showcasing - not showcased! Typo City, Arizona.
ReplyDeletePhillip
counterpart - not counterpart's! Gibberish!
ReplyDeletePhillip