Thanks to Charlie Horse 47 and Killdumpster for their sponsorship of this post, via the magic of Patreon.
***
Excitement mounts as Marvel celebrates its 25th birthday!
However, as you might expect, Shellhead gets in the villain's way.
But not in time to save Fortune!
He also draws some of the interior pages - as do Kerry Gammill, Ron Frenz, Al Milgrom and John Buscema. Just what's going on with this issue?
Only 23 pages for Thor, though, as he returns to Earth for some Me Time. But he's soon warned by his friends the frogs that something's amiss underground.
Spidey's clearly determined to not be outdone by Iron Man when it comes to boring covers.
But what of his innards?
His innards currently contain the aftermath of Flash Thompson's escape from jail. A feat that sees the whole city trying to track him down.
Jonah, though, still has his mind on the wall-crawler and even recruits X-Factor in a bid to defeat our hero!
And even Conan can't escape The Curse of the Boring Cover.
But, inside, I have no doubt things are far more thrilling when the barbarian seeks out Ybn Lord of Assassins, in a mission to find the boy-king child of someone called Anneka.
I'm assuming this isn't the Anneka of Japanese Boy fame. For some reason, her turning up in a Conan story would give me great pleasure.
Ooh. Hold on. I actually had this one.
I remember Barry Smith drawing it and it involving Daredevil and the Black Widow vs some sort of PTSD Super-Soldier person who needs stopping before he does any more damage.
You'd never guess it from that cover but Avengers drama hits heights it's arguably never reached before, as Baron Zemo and his new Masters of Evil seize control of the Avengers Mansion while the heroes are all out doing other things!
Can Cap's reputation ever recover?
It's starting to look like it never may because, after he gets bad press for killing a terrorist, someone called Super-Patriot steps in to take his place in the hearts of Americans!
Why do I feel like Super-Patriot is going to turn out to be a bad guy?
I'm going to venture that this Incredible Hulk issue sports the weakest of Marvel's covers, this month.
But, within, things are stirring, thanks to a funeral and Zzzax being brought to Gamma Base.
And when the Hulk seems to break out of that selfsame base, SHIELD finds itself up against a new Hulk! One who grabs Bruce Banner and abducts him!
According to the GCD, Peter Parker investigates a gang that's insinuated itself into an apartment building.
I'm not totally sure how you insinuate yourself into a building but they've managed it somehow.
I'm going to venture that, of this month's cover artists, John Romita Jr has done the best job when it comes to trying to make something from the basic theme.
And it's for an issue in which the Marauders cut a swathe of destruction through the Morlocks' tunnels while our favourite mutants try to stop them.
But what's this? Barry Smith too has managed to inject some kind of interest into the cover template.
And why is it 64 pages long?
Regardless, it's a story that sees our favourite super-team battle the Mole Man.
And it sees the Thing reclaim his place among their ranks.
Only 23 pages for Thor, though, as he returns to Earth for some Me Time. But he's soon warned by his friends the frogs that something's amiss underground.
Needless to say, he's not going to put up with that sort of thing.
And that brings him into conflict with the Marauders - and into a crossover with the X-Men.













20 comments:
I’m guessing the anniversary is 25 years since FF #1, therefore double-sided issue for the FF
Wow. I’d totally forgotten that 25th Anniversary cover stunt. What a terrible idea that was. I think i bought the DAREDEVIL and FANTASTIC FOUR, but remember nary a thing about them. The covers ring a bell but that’s about it.
b.t.
Poor Charlie has never seen any of these covers he thinks. Yet he got a very warm tingling feeling when seeing Black Knight on the Avengers 273 cover!
That is because when Charlie bought Avengers 100, 173 issues / 54 years ago, when he was 11 (off the spinner, natch!) he was bewildered at all the head shot panels Barry Smith had drawn inside, particularly the Black Knight’s! And his art was just unusual for the times somit has stuck with Charlie for 54 years.
I remember this now. I had the DD and the Thor.
It's an odd choice of design for 25th Anniversary month - doesn't exactly scream 'gravitas', does it? It reminds me of the Assistant Editors' Month stunt.
What exactly is going on with that DD cover? It looks like a Fred Hembeck cartoon. I can't remember the Barry Smith art, though I'm sure I'd have quite liked it.
Did Marvel do anything else to commemorate the 25th Anniversary?
Wasn't the ( mostly) awful New Universe (Starfire, DP 7 etc)line linked in some way to Marvels 25th anniversary?
In 2019 Marvel celebrated its' 80th anniversary after back-dating the company's origin to 1939!
Pedant Alert! They weren't back-dating anything, Colin - Marvel Comics #1 literally came out in 1939.
https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Marvel_Comics_Vol_1_1
The November 1961 anniversary being marked here was the start of the "Marvel Age of Comics" as they used to call it, which began with the publication of Fantastic Four #1. Although as it happens the Marvel Comics brand - which back then was the tiny box with the letters MC in it that you can see on early issues of the FF - first appeared on the June '61 cover-dated Journey Into Mystery #69, and Patsy Walker #95.
-sean
Steve, on the plus side at least these covers would have been a nice earner for the artists involved. I mean, I can't imagine that, say, drawing the head shot for Conan #188 took John Buscema more than five minutes... yet presumably he still got paid the regular Marvel cover rate.
Agree with you on Bazza's doing something interesting with his Thing cover for FF #296. But not about Romita Jr's X-Men; irrespective of concept, it just isn't a good drawing imo.
The Simonson Thor is nicely done, for what it is.
-sean
I loved this cover gimmick. It was a cool way to mark the anniversary.
By the time these books came out, I wasn't buying a single Marvel comic. Thus I can only assess the covers! And in so doing I'd agree with those praising Conan, Avengers and Fantastic Four. The whole 25th. Anniversary cover thing is kind of reminiscent of the Marvel Annuals from 1983: All the covers were a black frame surrounding a rather generic image of the book's star. Mostly unremarkable...
Anon, your FF #1 theory does indeed make sense.
Bt, Red, Rip, Sean, Colin, McScotty, Matthew and Charlie, thanks for your comments too. :)
Going off-topic, I see M John Harrison has become the first 'science-fiction writer' to win the Booker prize.
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2026/nov/09/m-john-harrison-the-end-of-everything-wins-2026-booker-prize
Good to see him finally get some wider recognition (although he's hardly been a typical genre writer). More importantly, Harrison is also - so far as I'm aware - the first winner to have written comics!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclops_(magazine)
-sean
Sean - Seemingly, a new genre has been coined by the Booker prize ( or just journos reporting it?) to account for the win, "literary science fiction" ! ( Palm slaps forehead! )
Phillip
In fairness to journos going on about it now, Phillip, you can see a younger M John Harrison with Michael Moorcock in the 1979 BBC series Time Out of Mind arguing something quite similar, that what they were doing different to regular 'genre sf', and more 'literary'.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhSFzbvwWBU
(In the bit that's time-stamped 'The New Worlds era')
-sean
*what they were doing was different to regular 'genre sf'...
And Margaret Atwood insisted she wrote speculative-fiction not science-fiction which she labelled "talking squids in outer space".
Very good documentary, Sean. Thanks for recommending it. Only near the end did I twig that the slightly built lad with the tash, in Moorcock's Yorkshire home, is this week's Booker Prize winner! Also, the Cornelius clip, with the XJS, managed to mention "obsidian". Clearly, someone has a sense of humour! You also got the brother-in-law from The Likely Lads, and Waiting For God's old male lead. Back to the present, I was only just watching Moorcock's latest Forbidden Planet broadcast, in which he was discussing Tom Disch, when - lo and behold - Disch appears in this documentary, too! Thanks again, for a good recommendation.
Colin - Philip K. Dick certainly wasn't limited by stock sci-fi conventions. Although Atwood & Moorcock have a point, it's a clearly a generalisation.
Phillip
it's clearly - not it's a clearly! Typo city, Ingleton, Arizona.
Phillip
Phillip, if you're up for checking out another link, there's an interesting piece here about how M John Harrison's Viriconium books have been marketed over the years, by taking a look at the covers -
https://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2012/06/11/covering-viriconium/
Margaret Atwood obviously wasn't a 'science fiction' writer because her publisher didn't just slap a pic of a futuristic spaceship on the cover of The Handmaid's Tale...
-sean
Thanks, Sean - I'll check it out, after I've had my tea.
Phillip
Post a Comment