Thanks to Charlie Horse 47 and Killdumpster for their sponsorship of this post, via the magic of Patreon.
***
There is no labyrinth so twisted, no world as uncharted, no puzzle so obscure as the workings of any normal mind! And if the mind be abnormal, then those who try to trace the tangled thread risk even their own sanity!
Wise words indeed.
And wise they should be.
For they come from no lesser gob than that of the Phantom Stranger, a man with a bucketful of words for any occasion.
In this case, that occasion is issue #28 of his book, the purchase of which was the first time I ever encountered the hat-happy man of mystery.
Needless to say, it was Nick Cardy's dramatic cover that drew me in, although, even at the time, I spotted, at once, that it contains a noticeable error.
But is it an error?
Or is it a deliberate hint as to the true nature of the tale's events?
And, Reader, can you spot what that, "error," is?
Inside the book, the deal is this. Willie Lemmick's a nice kid, helpful to all he meets...
...until those occasions when he becomes possessed by his alter ego Joseph Ganz.
For, you see, Ganz is a homicidal maniac with a love of armed robbery and a tendency to think everyone and everything he meets is a monster.
After his attempt to hijack a plane is foiled by the Phantom Stranger, Willie's put on trial but the jury's struggling to decide whether his lifetime of committing pointless but demented crimes means he's genuinely mad or just putting it on to get himself off the hook.
Happily, the Phantom Stranger's in the habit of hanging around in jury deliberation rooms and has a solution.
He'll use his powers to probe Willie's mind and get to the truth, finally doing so by confronting him with a physical incarnation of Ganz.
At this point, a horrified Willie declares that Ganz can't be real because he made him up.
Armed with this confession, surely the jury is guaranteed to convict.
Except it's not that simple.
After all, as one of the jurors points out, surely only a true madman would go to such lengths as to commit a string of totally pointless but demented crimes, over a period of years, purely in an attempt to prove himself insane.
And, so, we leave our story, as the Phantom Stranger departs the courtroom and we, he, the judge and jury ponder upon the true nature of insanity.
It's a surprisingly short tale and relates much of its info by flashback but it is one that sticks in the mind and may be the first psychologically-based comic I ever read.
I've always had a liking for Gerry Talaoc's artwork, and Arnold Drake does a solid job, even though, with its quick jumps in time, and flashbacks, it does feel, at times, as though something's been cut out.
It does strike me, however, that the Phantom Stranger's behaviour would get the case thrown out in a real court.
Would he really be allowed to hang around in the jury deliberation room, eavesdropping on its discussions?
Would he really be allowed to visit Willie in his cell, with no lawyer present?
And would any confession thus obtained be at all admissible as evidence?
I suspect not.
We can only conclude that it only goes to show the level of respect the criminal justice system has for him.
Even though it's hard to see how it could even know he exists.
So, there you go. If you're ever stricken by a legal conundrum, call in a corny man in a hat and a cape.
Just don't expect him to ever solve the conundrum.
45 comments:
Were the Phantom Stranger's hat brim slightly wider, he'd be Death-Stalker!
Phillip
I spotted the error on the cover, although I won't mention it so that others can look- have to wonder how an editor didn't pick up on that though!
Reminds me of an old Hulk issue where a d-list villain called Commander Kraken I'd seen looking through a periscope with his right eye. The next panel shows him turning round, and wee see his right eye is covered by an eyepatch!
Weeelll... some might say that perhaps the cover shouldn't be taken literally, and it isn't an error at all. As the review implies.
You may be over-thinking the US legal system of DC Earth One, Steve - no-one seems that bothered about the Gotham City cops working with some rich nutcase running round at night dressed as a bat and beating people up, so would supernatural beings interfering with a jury be considered a problem?
Anyway, enjoyed the review even though I'm not that much into the Phantom Stranger - its nice to see Gerry Talaoc getting some love from the world's greatest comic blog.
-sean
Mystery swirls around the Phantom Stranger. Who is he? What dread purpose does he serve?
Is he, like Alan Moore suggested, a fallen angel?
One thing that everybody can agree upon is that the Phantom Stranger is irritating. Even Aquaman didn't like him. That's probably what got him tossed outta Heaven, being a pain in the ass.
This issue has a Nick Cardy cover. Cardy was one of the go-to guys for D.C. covers in the 70's. Really nice, slick covers, spinner-rack bait, and I think he did some of the covers for those over-size "Treasury Editions" D.C. was pumping out back then. Marvel was doing the same thing, of course.
They were full of goofy old reprints, which looked even cruder in that enlarged format, but the covers were fantastic. I used to have that one, the Secret Origins of Super-villains framed and on my wall. Then I moved and kinda forgot about it.
Google it! Man, what a cool cover. That mighta been Cardy. Maybe Grell, I dunno.
Everything you ever wanted to know about Captain Cold but was afraid to ask.
I guess...
M.P.
I googled it M.P.!
And found covers for two limited collector editions - thats what DC called their treasuries, right? - of Secret Origins of Super-Villains, and both turned out to be by Dick Giordano.
Eh. They were ok, but I don't know that I'd say either was especially cool.
Not even the one with Captain Cold on it.
-sean
Giordano? Really? I wouldn't have guessed that, Sean.
I stand corrected.
This is what happens when I post a comment and I'm too dang lazy to do any research.
Still, I remember seeing the ads for those, ah, "Limited Collector Additions" as they called them, when I was a kid and thought they looked really cool. Remember those? The Marvel stuff too. I was an absolute nut for comics back then.
As an adult (it helps to have a job and money) over the years I tracked down some of them in various comic book stores that sold back issues.
Owning them didn't turn out to be much of a thrill after all, but I hadda get it outta my system.
M.P.
I meant "Editions", not "Additions". Yeesh.
How mortifying!
M.P. (somewhat abashed)
Steve - Love the review. Thanks much! I bought a few PS off the spinner but not this one. But, my news agency had two spinners so who knows...
MP - I been "getting it out of my system" with the $1 Marvel Comic book reprints the past two years. But now Marvel stopped that and is, again, reprinting a bunch of series from issue #1 in collected paper-back editions for like $15. Not a bad deal. And the paper is not that absurd shiny-white stuff they were using in the 1990s - 2000s.
Sean - I get all tingly like I used to, reading comics now. But now and then I get into some good stuff I never read e.g., some of the french stuff you recommended.
I'm eating some raisin bran cereal now, because I had too much meat at dinner yesterday night. There was no toy in the box of cereal.
MP - I still have a bunch of those oversize DC Collector editions. Even though I had to unmercifully downsize due to the divorce last year, I could not bear to part with them. Something magical about them. I could part with the wife but not those particular comics. Life at 60, eh?
Years later its too late M.P.
But don't get me started on the ads in comics for things like Limited Collector Editions, Famous First Editions and the all the rest. A few of the Marvel Treasuries were imported, but generally back then you just knew stuff like that wasn't going to turn up for sale anywhere here.
-sean
Charles, I was not informed of these $1 Marvel reprints. Perhaps it's high time I pay my local comic shop a visit. I'm sure they miss the presence of a seasoned aficionado such as myself.
Or maybe not, probably, but they need all the business they can get.
I have an enormous collection of comics that will somehow have to be divvied up when I shuffle off this mortal coil. Who knows what its worth.
At some point, down the road, we might have to call in some professional appraisers, eh, Charlie?
But not yet, dammit.
I refuse to part with any of it!
Not yet, anyway. I'm like the dragon Smaug.
M.P.
I’m fair chuffed as I also see the error in the cover as well ( but it took me about 10 mins to suss it out lol). Although I was aware of the Phantom Stranger at this time via his appearances in other comics like JLA, Batman etc my first (and last PS)) comic was the very next one , issue 29. I have since picked up a few back issues from this time that had some great covers and interior art by Neal Adams and Jim Aparo (soon to be shown on my blog ). It also had that strange "Spawn of Frankenstein" strip where a green Frankie in a purple cape look as if he was perpetually sucking on a mint imperial sweet.
Charlie: I picked up the Spiderman collected paper-back edition last month and agree it’s a very nice (and handy sized) book so I hope they continue to publish other titles. The $1 Marvel “True Believes” were excellent comics as are the Facsimile editions (that reprint the ads , letters pages etc as well) I plan to pick up the latest “Conan the Barbarian” issue 1 facsimile soon. DC used to do the facsimiles as well but seemingly they stopped them as they were outselling some of their newer titles, says it all about new comics lol.
I've got Marvel Treasury Editions of Thor, Dr.Strange & Hulk. No D.C.'s equivalents, however.
M.P. - Charlie recommended the $1 reprints, a while back. In fact, he bought the $1 reprint of Moon knight # 1, based on my recommendation! ;) To be serious, Charlie - I think you bought it before my testimonials for it!
Paul - Forces TV is showing 'The Omega Factor', tonight. Strangely, I don't remember it - but, from my meagre research, it sounds like a Scottish inspiration for 'The X-Files'.
Phillip
Paul, some might say the popularity of reprints tells you a lot about the readers too.
And yeah Steve - what happened to Spawn of Frankenstein?
-sean
Philip. I'll need to check out the Omega Factor show again as I only have a vague memory of it. In 1979 I would have been at the "dancin’" strutting my stuff to Chic and Kool and the Gang ! 😊
Sean. That's very true maybe it is unfair to expect new comics to appeal to many 50 plus year olds and I suppose you stick to what you like/remember. Still new comics really should not be outsold by “old man” reprints if that was indeed the reason.It may have been that the sale of the facsimiles ate into the sales of the collected editions.
Trust me. I picked up $1 True Believer Moon Knight b/c of you gents! It WAS a good read!
$1 True Believer has been discontinued. I'm pissed. It was original cover and story but no ads, letters, checklists, etc.
$5 facsimile editions may be discontinued? It was a bit steep for me. It did have letters, ads, etc. but I could replicate that aspect with a comic from the long boxes.
DC, of course, was making a bit of a hash with their fascimile editions. They were reprinting things like "important" changing to Green Lanterns that I never followed in the first place.
Truth is there simply are no legendary DC like Spidey 101 or Avengers 60 or any green Captain Marvel, but for Kirby's Dingbats, that would be worth $1?
UK Gents! Help?
I keep coming in on the tail end of Hawksbee and Jacobs talking about some show tonight (?) about some guy named Graham (?) on BBC 4 (?) that hasn't been seen for a long time on the telly and is really worth a look?
Admittedly I am not giving much accurate data but you guys are super sleuths. What are they talking about?
MP - If your comic shop may have some True Believers hanging around. Mine sold out but then again there are hundreds of thousands of people within 10 miles of me which, I think, is more than your total state of Dakota?
So product moves pretty quickly here but you may luck out!
Anyhow you can search "Marvel True Believer Lot" and maybe score a bunch for like $1 each plus shipping?
A quick look and some guys has a 10-pak of really great issues for $13 plus $5 shipping. But you can "make an offer" him and maybe get it for much cheaper.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/123944060145?hash=item1cdba444f1:g:pGMAAOSwE21c2a~k
CH: The only thing I can think of that hasn't been seen in years on BBC 4 (and most BBC networks this week) is "The Last Goon Show" on Tuesday which was a bit of a UK cult amongst some folk (I'm not a big despite the talent on the show ie Peter Sellers, Spike Milligan and Harry Secombe). It's the filming of the 1972 recording of their last radio show but no Grahams involved that I am aware off and "Hawksbee and Jacobs" usually gibber on about football (soccer) so its not footy related. Probably not much use sorry.
Charlie, I think they may have been referring to Channel 4 which is, tonight, re-showing an old edition of Cutting Edge which followed the England manager Graham Taylor around as he tried to get his team to qualify for the 1994 World Cup.
Sean, I touched on the Spawn of Frankenstein tale during my review of Phantom Stranger #26: https://stevedoescomics.blogspot.com/2019/06/phantom-stranger-26-spawn-of.html
It's a fairly slight and unsatisfying tale that I couldn't bring myself to give a full review to.
Ahh that's what it will be Steve didn't think of C4.
Sorry I meant to add Jim Aparo's version of "Spawn of Frankenstein" was very different to Bernard Bailey's (of golden age Spectre fame) version which was pretty dated even for the 1970s but it still had a strange charm to it.
You know... to summarize what I wise man once said about Phantom Stranger in June of 2019...
"The Phantom Stranger had so many great covers. Somehow, he was one of those characters who was better suited to appearing on the front of books than he was to appearing inside them."
Ummm... as long as you gents are humoring old Charlie...
This "ashes" thing. I only have heard of it via H&J. Today, working from home, I turned on Sky Sport and they are all about "the ashes."
And then they show an urn. W.t.h... are we talking about someone's ashes? Like someone was cremated and now England and Australia are fighting over the right to put someone's ashes on display in the club house?
I mean, I went to Purdue Univeristy and our greatest rival is Indiana University. For like 100 years the "Oaken Bucket" game has concluded our respective US Football seasons each year. But we are fighting over a literal oaken bucket. Fighting over an oaken bucket seems lame to fighting over a cremated corpse?
Charlie - Still on a Hallowe'en theme, for some strange reason, the tabloid press always depicted Graham Taylor as a turnip! (the poor man's pumpkin).
Phillip
Charlie - The bales were burned (or something!) Australia & England competed for them (or something!)
There was a tv series about it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4qJbqsTGoY
Phillip
Charlie, theres loads of great old DC comics that could be reprinted, not just Dingbats (an obvious classic).
They should probably try reprinting the less super-heroey stuff - some of those old mystery books aren't cheap as back issues, which suggests theres an audience for that kind of thing.
Actually, if I was in charge at DC I'd put together a new "dollar comic" style anthology series featuring the better short stories from Weird War Tales, House of Mystery/Secrets etc drawn by Berni Wrightson, the mighty Alex Nino, Alfredo Alcala and so on. F*** Green Lantern.
And I'd reprint the Kirbys, not just Dingbats. In a giant treasury/Raw style format.
-sean
On the subject of new comics, at the shops near me the other day I noticed that there are now British DCs.
I nearly bought Batman: Guardian of the Night #7, 48pgs for £2.99.
www.panini.co.uk/shp_gbr_en/blog/batman-guardian-of-the-night-vol-1-7
But I had a quick flick through first, and it looked a bit s*** so I didn't.
-sean
CH. The Ashes originate from 1882 when England were beaten at home for the first time by Australia. As usual even back then, the English press went overboard and said it was the death of English cricket and it should be burned down and the ashes sent to Australia. The next time England played Australia the Aussies presented them with a joke of the ashes from cricket bails presented in an urn that has now become the Ashes. Graham Taylor was a nice man the English press totally abused because England didn't qualify for the World Cup, you know it's bad press when Scotland fans rally around the England team. The English press really put to much pressure on their sportspeople.
Well its late on Monday so why not ask…
McScotty, er al. Is scotland getting beat by Afghanistan in cricket as dreadul as Australia beating Enlgand in 1882?
Well it's 2 different leagues really England and Australia at cricket are major cricket nations ranked about second and Third in the world, I think New Zealand are number 1.I'm not sure why Australia beating England in 1882 was such a big deal. Today Australia beating England would be expected and vice versa. Even although Scotland are ranked about 13th (similar to Ireland) the difference in those positions is immense and there are only 20 top ranked nations. Afghanistan are around mid table but Asia is a big cricket region so no it's in no way a shock as hardly anyone plays cricket in Scotland generally if a Scot is really good they play for England and I think in the past a Scot was the captain of England. Cricket baffles me but it has it's charms.
Also, the Scotland game was a T20 meaning there were only 20 overs of 6 deliveries (for simplicity let's leave wides and no balls out of the equation), meaning the entire game is over in about 4 hours. The Ashes is a test series meaning five matches, each of which consists of 5 full days. If a team has not been bowled out twice (two innings) across the 5 days, the match is declared a draw. So five matches each of 5 full days, in which each match can possibly ending in a draw. And west it is absolutely fascinating and compulsive. The definition of slow burn.
BTW, the actual Ashes urn never leaves Lords (the Marylebone cricket ground in London) and is only around 4 inches high. If Australia win (or more likely retain) them a replica is used.
DW
'end in a draw' and 'yet it is absolutely fascinating'...
DW
And the relevance of the T20 format being much more likely to result in an upset.
DW
Good lord... what in the world did you just say DW???
Charlie
I started typing an explanation but realised I was quickly losing clarity ;-) This link is a bit dry, but does summarise the rules:
https://www.cricket-rules.com
Cricket does seem to be one of those games that people either love or hate (or more accurately find boring), which I believe does come down the individual's grasp of the rules. My point, however, was that an international game between two countries (say England and Australia) can last 4 hours (T20), one day (ODI) or twenty five days (full test series, such as the Ashes). All formats are equally valid (albeit the traditionalists don't much care for the shorter versions) and result in much celebration, from the winning fans to the losing fans.
I would provide a fuller explanation however it would likely take around three years to type...
DW
DW Ahhh that's what T20 means I wasn't sure. I was amazed how hard and fast a cricket ball is, it may look a gentile game but its lethal
So — the “mistake” is that the Monsterized half of the guy’s face is on the wrong side in the mirror, yes?
I’ve always had a soft spot for the Stranger. He’s both hip and square at the same time.
The first few Spawn of Frankenstein stories were drawn by Mike Kaluta. If I remember right, everyone’s favorite daft, hysterical skeptic Dr. 13 was a supporting character in that strip too.
b.t.
Well remembered b.t. I forgot Kaluta drew the fist few issues of Spawn of Frankenstein (issue 23) before Bernard Bailey took over the art chores from issue 27.
Paul - I watched 'The Omega Factor', last night. It was made by BBC Scotland, and Edinburgh's the setting. Suitable pre-Hallowe'en tv fodder! Shows some promise.
Phillip
Tomorrow (October 27th) is exactly 30 years since Bryan Adams' mega-hit 'Everything I Do, I Do It For You' was knocked off the UK #1 spot after 16 weeks at the top. I know it's got absolutely nothing to do with the current topic but I feel this moment of national historic importance should be remembered. But what song replaced The Adams at #1? Apparently it was "The Fly" by U2 - no, I don't remember it either even after watching it on YouTube :D
Thanks Philip I'll have a look at that episode of Omega Factor .
Colin. I think that Bryan Adams song being number one for so long is very applicable for Halloween and the Phantom Stranger as it was horrific having to listen to it for so long a fair song by an artist I like but jeeez 16 weeks of constant air play, the horror ( the Fly by U2 wasn't great either). 😁
Phil, the first episode of 'The Omega factor' was broadcast on the VERY SAME DAY that I got my first portable TV in 1979. My TV was delivered on Wednesday, June 13th 1979 and I watched episode 1 of 'The Omega factor' that same night on my new portable TV.
Colin - Interesting! The show had a definite Fortean whiff hanging over it, with not one - but two - Aleister Crowley (the Beast)-type figures. The fact that Louise Jameson (clearly the female lead) wasn't the protagonist's wife, was an obvious clue of his wife's upcoming death in the first episode, leaving a gap for Jameson's character to fill. Also, the hero's dead wife trope arises in so many shows (Incredible Hulk, Earth Final Conflict, First Wave, the Fugitive, & loads of others). That psychiatrist, Roy Martindale (?), resembles Gordon Burns, from 'The Krypton (not Omega)Factor' !
Phillip
Colin, the demise of that Bryan Adams track was verily a thing to celebrate. Adams managed the spectacular feat of making me glad U2 had got to Number One.
Bt, that is indeed, the cover error.
Post a Comment