Tuesday 7 February 2023

Fifty years ago today - February 1973.

Thanks to Charlie Horse 47 and Killdumpster for their sponsorship of this post, via the magic of Patreon
***

Time. I hear it goes well with parsley. But here's where we have to be sage, as we cast our eyes back through the years, to 1973, and decide just which Marvel issues would have been worth handing over 20 cents for.

Captain America and the Falcon #158

"You'll kill him! And if you do--!" says Cap but I've never read the tale and may, thus, never know to what grim fate he alludes.

Whatever it is, it would appear to be bad news for the Viper.

Amazing Spider-Man #117, The Disruptor

The Disruptor demonstrates his own brand of bringing politics to the masses, as Richard Raleigh continues his terrible attempt to become Mayor of New York.

Or is he trying to become President? I can never remember.

Avengers #108, Grim Reaper and the Space Phantom

It's the long-awaited return of the Space Phantom!

I say long-awaited but, when I first read this tale, as a youth, I got the Space Phantom mixed up with the Space Parasite and was highly confused as to why he'd so dramatically changed appearance.

I struggle to remember just how the Grim Reaper ties into all this.

Conan the Barbarian #23, the Vulture

At last, the Vulture finally shows up!

As mentioned last month, his arrival was delayed by the trials and tribulations of the postal service but it's worth the wait, as Conan and Red Sonja ensure the villain suffers a fate that shall live long in the recall of all who read this tale.

Daredevil #96, the Man-Bull

It's a magnificently melodramatic cover from Gil Kane when the Man-Bull starts turning San Francisco's residents into monsters.

With DD in hospital, can a solo Black Widow hope to succeed where he failed, and thwart the Taurean terror?

As it turns out, the answer's, "No."

Incredible Hulk #160, Tiger Shark

It's another classic, as the Hulk meets Tiger-Shark.

It's all because Bruce Banner's discovered Betty and Glenn have got married. And that means his alter-ego's headed to Niagra Falls, in a bid to wreck their honeymoon.

Unfortunately, the fishy fiend thinks the Hulk's come looking for him, on behalf of the Sub-Mariner, and the inevitable fight breaks out.

Iron Man #55, the Destroyer

Hooray! No doubt, tired of drawing Mighty World of Marvel covers, Jim Starlin shows up on Iron Man!

And, no sooner has he arrived than so have Thanos, Drax, Mentor, Eros, Kronos and I.S.A.A.C.

Jim isn't exactly wasting time, is he? It's a miracle he didn't throw in Moondragon, Gamora and Pip the Troll while he was at it.

Fantastic Four #131, Quicksilver and Crystal

Jim Steranko gives us the outside but Ross Andru gives us the insides, as the Human Torch gets a little miffed upon discovering his beloved Crystal is to marry no one's beloved Quicksilver.

Next, we'll be discovering Dorrie Evans is marrying Sunfire.

Thor #208, Mercurio

Thor must defeat the hot and cold menace of Mercurio, the Fourth-Dimensional Man. All while whittling over the disappearance of Sif and feeling guilty about having snapped at Jarvis the butler.

X-Men #80, the Juggernaut

I don't have a clue what happens in this one, other than knowing that both the Juggernaut and Factor Three put in an appearance.

Action Comics #421, Captain Strong

That's Marvel accounted for but what of DC?

Just what was happening in a random assortment of its books that bear the same cover date?

This is what's happening.

It's the clash we've all been waiting for, when Superman must find a way to defeat Popeye!

Or, at least, Captain Strong who bears no resemblance to the cartoon sailor man and has gained super-strength after eating too much seaweed.

In the book's other strip, the Green Arrow can be found in solo action.

The Brave and the Bold #105, Batman and Wonder Woman

Possibly the first issue of The Brave and the Bold I ever owned, and one that sports a cracking cover by Jim Aparo.

It's a shame, really, that I can't remember anything about the plot. I do know Diana Prince's Amazonian guardian angel shows up, at one point, in order to save her life.

I do believe offshore gambling ships may also be involved but don't quote me on that.

Legion of Super-Heroes #1

Here's a surprise for some of us. I never knew the Legion of Super-Heroes had their own book so shortly before they became a regular back-up strip in Superboy's comic.

However, there's not that much to get excited about because this publication will only manage to last for four issues before folding.

In this one, Command Kid joins the Legion but his arrogance alienates his teammates. I'm not sure what any of that has to do with the front cover.

We also get a Tommy Tomorrow adventure that goes by the title The Riddle of the Space Rainbow.

I've no idea who Tommy Tomorrow is but he sounds like he might be the sort of kid who hangs around with Joe 90.

Shazam! #1

DC finally notices it has the rights to the original Captain Marvel, and gives him his own comic.

However, thanks to legalities involving Marvel now having a character of the same name, that new book must be called Shazam.

In this issue, we're regaled with the good Captain's origin, followed by a battle with Dr Sivana.

Secrets of Sinister House #9

Jack Sparling  gives us an attention-grabbing cover, and the Secrets of Sinister House offers up such tales as Rub a Witch the Wrong Way!The Dance of the Damned and The Abominable Snowman.

100-Page Super Spectacular #DC-14

A brand new book arrives to rock us all when 100-Page Super Spectacular #DC-14 hits the racks. Why it's labelled #DC-14 if it's the first issue, I've no idea.

Anyway, its senses-shattering pages feature action from Batman, the Atom, Blackhawk, Wonder Woman, Dollman and Wildcat, in a string of elderly reprints that can't fail to hook the discerning and undiscerning reader alike.

20 comments:

Anonymous said...

Thanks Steve!!! As they say nowadays, “Love me some 100 pagers!” Especially featuring Quality Comics with Reed Crandall on Blackhawks!”

Anonymous said...

Seriously! Atom and Dollman together in a story? Or is it two separate stories? Lou Fine on Dollman.. yowza, yowza, yowza!

Anonymous said...

Marvel kind of kicked us in the juevos taking and keeping copyrights of Daredevil and Captain Marvel. I mean who in the world is going to mix up Lev Gleason, Fawcett, and Marvel characters??? I Think in the latest comics featuring the original daredevil, they must call him now something like the fork tailed devil? Or some stupid malarkey like that.

Anonymous said...

Two of today’s featured titles were in that stack of comics I got from the Neighbor Kid Who Didn’t Want Em Anymore — X-MEN 80 and HULK 160. I don’t remember the details of the X-Men story all that well, Steve, but I seem to recall that the X-kids got all dressed up and went to a sock hop, which was then crashed by a gang of bikers. Possibly, I’m conflating it with a Frankie and Annette ‘Beach Movie’ playing on the TV while I read it. I have zero memory of Juggernaut’s role in all this, not a single image of him drawn blandly by Werner Roth was embedded in my brain cells. Nice Kane / Giacoia cover, though.

I was all set to rhapsodize about DAREDEVIL 97, CONAN THE BARBARIAN 25 and HERO FOR HIRE 8, which I acquired half a century ago this very week — but I forgot that you list comics that were COVER-DATED ‘Fifty Years Ago’, not comics that were actually on sale that month. So I will save my Nostalgia Deep Dive on that trio for another time.

b.t.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous, the Atom and Doll Man appear in separate stories in that DC 100 Page Super Spectacular, and do not team up.
The Doll Man story isn't credited, but it looks pretty average for its time and I will eat my hat if it was drawn by Lou Fine. However, you may be pleased to know it DOES feature Elmo, the dynamic dog. His first appearance no less!

Tbh, that sort of old stuff isn't generally my cup of tea. Reed Crandall is all very well, but Chop Chop? (tsk tsk)
Still, the Marston/Peter Wonder Woman story - which introduces her magic lasso - is a good one, and definitely makes the comic worthwhile. My favourite bit is where she goes back to Paradise Island as the Amazons are holding their Athletic Games, just in time to enter the Girl Roping contest. Yep, thats an Amazon sport - "This is a free for all: you will lasso an opponent, pull her to the ground, and tie her up!" Oh, and its played riding giant kangaroos.

Steve, its not the first DC 100 Page Super Spectacular, its just previously they were numbered consistently with another regular title. What I mean is, if you look on the (Neal Adams wraparound) cover of the 100 Page Superman #252, its also numbered 'DC-13'. A few issues before that, Adventure Comics #416 was also DC-10 etc etc
Except for the first three issues which were just DC 100 Page Super Spectacular #s4-6. I've no idea why it started with #4.

-sean

Anonymous said...

Well, that was interesting about DC numbering, wasn't it?
Erm... anyhow, I like that Daredevil cover - in part because I fondly recall actually reading the comic as a little scrote back in early '73 - but my fave is Brave & the Bold #105. You're right, Steve, it is cracking.
But don't worry, I won't quote you on offshore gambling ships because there aren't any in it.

I think you might be conflating two different comics, as there is a ship, but its docked on the riverfront - part of a smuggling operation from the Latin American state of San Sebastian - and holding a secret prisoner that Bats and Diana help some revolutionary guerillas rescue.
I don't know why revolutionary guerillas are involved with a rich bourgeois exploiter of the proletariat like Bruce Wayne/Batman and vice versa, but hey - its a Bob Haney story.

-sean

Steve W. said...

Sean, thanks for the Brave and the Bold info and also the DC 100-page numbering history.

Bt, thanks for that X-Men info.

Anon (Charlie?), comicbook copyright and trademark law is a bewildering and mysterious beast. I'd love to know if anyone who wants to is allowed to create a comic called Apeslayer, seeing as Marvel seems to have no interest in protecting the name.

Anonymous said...

As far as I can tell, Steve, it basically boils down to who has the money to spend on lawyers. Its not like the 60s anymore, when no-one gave a sh*t about a 'Daredevil' who's comic had been cancelled for a decade. Marvel Walt Disney protect the rights to all their characters - its where the value is in the company.

The Planet Money podcast looked into comic book IPs by trying to 'buy a superhero', offering the big two publishers money for the rights to an obscure character. They got nowhere. Because now that even Groot or Polka Dot Man can be a hit in big budget movies, who's to say Apeslayer or Tommy Tomorrow couldn't be next?

Iirc, they said Marvel alone own over 7000 characters. Thats a nightmare vision of the future of film right there.

-sean

Charlie Horse 47 said...

"Anonymous" Charlie here...

Thanks for the update Sean!

Lou Fine, Reed Crandall, Will Eisner, Jack Cole... I dare say I'd take them over Kirby, Romita, Ditko, Buscema... (and Trimpe, Tuska, Heck).

I am also inclined to say that Eisner's Spirit and Cole's Plastic Man were the best comics ever? But how is one to judge that? I now wonder if they may have actually outsold Marvel in the halcyon 1960s?

The inappropriate portrayal Chop Chop was also odd. Not sure why it was there unless for comic relief?

That said, I never felt as offended by Ebony in The Spirit. But I'd have to dig out my archives to remember why.

Charlie Horse 47 said...

STEVE - having worked in IP litigation for several years, I should know all that stuff about Copyrights. But it's been 25 years now. Seems like a lifetime away. But if you let rights lapse as DC did with Cpt Marvel then the name becomes public domain. Fair enough.

But I am not sure how Marvel could then turn around and copyright it once the name fell into the public domain.

I mean, it'd be like folks copyrighting also those classic books and songs published a hundred(s) year ago which are in public domain and published by multiple publisher?

Anyhow, IIRC, DC was still able to use the name Captain Marvel inside the comic, just not on the cover?

And Charlie has contributed absolutely nothing to this conversation on trademarks, lol.

Charlie Horse 47 said...

GENTS - THIS IS IMPORTANT AND CAN'T WAIT UNTIL THURSDAY!

Twomorrows p\Publishing is deeply discounting DINGBAT LOVE for Valentine's Day!

Screw the Candy!!! Get DINGBAT LOVE!

It's got two (!!) unpublished Kirby DINGBAT Stories and also features Kirby's TRUE-LIFE DIVORCE comics!!! (Cleavage galore!)

Charlie can't think of a better way to tell your significant other how much you love them than by getting this book!

Colin Jones said...

I hated Apeslayer and I even considered ditching the POTA weekly because of him!

Anonymous said...

Charlie: I think the thing with Captain Marvel and Daredevil was that they were considered ‘Abandoned Trademarks’ or something like that, I think? So, it’s not the same as a copyright falling into Public Domain. Someone once explained to me the differences between a Trademark and a Copyright but I don’t recall all the details.

Also, I second your suggestion that everyone grab a copy of DINGBAT LOVE if they don’t have it already.

Also, even before Marvel became part of the Disney IP Machine, they were notoriously aggressive about ‘protecting’ character names that they supposedly had rights to. When Dave Stevens sold the Rocketeer movie rights to Disney, they filed suit against both Dave and Disney, claiming that they owned the name ‘Rocketeer’, based on ONE issue of MARVEL PREMIERE featuring The Torpedo fighting a group of bad guys called the Rocketeers.

b.t.

Charlie Horse 47 said...

Can't wait to see a JLA cover and a Hero for Hire cover on Thursday!

Sing the praises!

Hail Hail!

Anonymous said...

b.t., I think thats more or less right about Captain Marvel, but the original Daredevil IS a case of an IP becoming Public Domain.
Which is why you could publish your own (LG) Daredevil comic so long as you took precautions not to infringe Marvel's trademark - like not putting the name on the cover - but not one about the Big Red Cheese. Legally only DC can do that (although they still have to be careful about the trademark).

Tbh Charlie, I actually have more of a problem with Ebony than a character like Chop Chop. Because it seems like Eisner should be better than that?
I mean, it wouldn't bother me much if I never read an old Blackhawks story ever again, but the Spirit...

-sean

Anonymous said...

Sean - And Jack Cole for creating an obese, not too ambitious, not too smart, not too honest Woozy Winks? Granted it’s always open season on stupid and greedy and lazy… but fat??? Beyond the pale??? LOL.

OK… i could luve out my remaining years without reading another Crandall Blackhawk. But dont take away the covers!

Charlie

Anonymous said...

https://thebristolboard.tumblr.com/post/79549202700/trio-of-original-blackhawk-covers-by-reed-crandall
Yeah, not bad (Chop Chop aside).
Tbh though Charlie, the Blackhawk that works for me is Howard Chaykin's revisionist version from the 80s, so I'm not really the person to listen to for an opinion on the older stuff.

On the subject of Chaykin btw, he did a great Tommy Tomorrow too in the 'Twilight' mini-series, with the mighty Jose Luis Garcia-Lopez (I just mention that because its a bit of a lost classic, well worth anyone's time).

-sean

McSCOTTY said...

Sean, I agree the portrayal of Eisners "Ebony" character wasn't ideal but to be fair to Eisner the character was never belittled and was treated with respect and as a friend of the Spirit. His appearance and speech patterns were of course could have been handled much better.

Anonymous said...

I think if that kind of thing is done 'well' that doesn't make it any better, Paul. If anything, you could say by being more defensible thats worse.
Just to be clear, I'm not saying Eisner was being malicious or anything like that - he needed a character to provide comic relief, and did something that wasn't usual at the time. Years later he said himself "Remember, I was still living in a world of Amos and Andy, but... in retrospect I'm embarrassed by what I frankly regard as a 'cop out'"

-sean

McSCOTTY said...

Sean, I agree I wasn't defending the character or Eisner , but as you say it was of its time, although that really isn't a good excuse either. But Ebony at least had some substance to him which was acknowledged by the US African American community. There was UK cartoon character in the 1970s called Sparky that was possibly the worst example of this type of work I've seen