Thanks to Charlie Horse 47 and Killdumpster for their sponsorship of this post, via the magic of Patreon.
***
March 1974 wasn't a great month for movies but it did see the release of three films few could ever forget. They were John Carpenter's Dark Star, The Great Gatsby and the equally great Godzilla vs Mechagodzilla.
Of those three, I would have to select the first as my Steve Does Comics Pick of the Month. After all, it's not every film that has a killer beachball in it, and I can't help feeling the other two would have been greatly enlivened by the addition of one.
The post-apocalyptic antagonism continues when the Martians capture Killraven, looking to achieve a propaganda coup by broadcasting his death to every human slave, thus destroying their will to resist.
That's assuming they have any will to resist, which isn't a thing I can remember their human slaves ever displaying.
I do believe this is the first issue to feature the deadly menace of the High Overlord.
And, to the surprise of some of us, it would appear the Monster would!
However, while he's successful in giving Drac a great big stake through the heart, the downside is he also has to destroy someone called Carmen, thanks to his foe having turned her into a vampire.
In this month's backup strip, we find Seeing Eye, a yarn reprinted from Uncanny Tales #22 in which a crook hatches a plan to steal a wealthy man's guide dog in exchange for a ransom.
But, wouldn't you know it? That guide dog only turns out to be a retired werewolf!
But it turns out it's no ghost that's causing the trouble. It's the ice-demon Ikthon. Can a man powered by Hellfire survive in a land that knows only numbing cold?
Next, we get James Bond Meets Baron Samedi, as brought to us by the talents of Don McGregor and Pablo Marcos. I've not read it but, given its subject matter, I'm going to assume it ties in with the events of Live and Let Die.
Then there's such fare as The Drums of Doom!, Neo Witch Craft, Courtship by Voodoo, Nightfilth Rising and The Four Daughters of Satan before we return to our main feature with Dead Man's Judgment! The Law and Phillip Bliss -- Part II.
In this terrifying yarn, we learn how Baron Russoff became a Werewolf and brought the curse of lycanthropy down upon his family.
This all, ultimately, leads to Drac attacking Jack and Topaz in an attempt to retrieve a mystic tome that once belonged to the Baron.
In it, Jack and Topaz visit Transylvania to investigate Jack's past and, inevitably, that leads to them entering Castle Dracula...
...lasts for about three panels before both parties lose interest in fighting and go their separate ways.
Given that the title is mere issues away from cancellation, I can only assume Spidey was added purely to provide a boost to sales.
In reality, the main thrust of the story deals with Subby having a rematch with the man called Force.
There are also further developments in the drama of Zephyrland. Developments which, if I remember rightly, lead to Dr Strange being called in to help liberate the beleaguered kingdom.
I do love a good monster comic, and the comic that loves monsters even more than I do tells us what happens when nuclear tests performed by a captive scientist awaken the ancient dragon Grogg.
However, it turns out, the scientist knew Grogg existed and disturbed him on purpose in order to create a distraction that would allow him to escape.
In this issue's second tale, explorers land on an alien planet, only to be attacked by monstrous animals.
Finally, thinking it seems like a good idea, they kill the biggest monster of the lot.
Only to discover it was really a robot that had been put there to hold the other animals in check.
And, now, those other animals are completely out of control!
23 comments:
From perusing the annals of History, it seems I had seven DC comics for this month:
Kamandi #15
Superman #273
Witching Hour #40
Weird War Tales #23
Wonder Woman #210
Prez #4
Jimmy Olsen #163.
I had five Marvels:
Marvel Spotlight #14
Sub-Mariner #69
Werewolf by Night #15.
Tomb of Dracula #18
Where Monsters Dwell #27.
And, scandalously, I had no Charltons.
I cant believe you did’na get the Shadow #2?!
Charlie’s tastes started changing… this month’s offerings didnt have the ginga he was looking for but for the FF and Shadow #2… but why?
Was it his age at 12 years old? He was becoming more sophisticated lol?
Was it just normal after three steady years of comics maybe 5-10 issues a month? Now everything seemed to have a sameness.
Was it the general disappearance of the great artists and the Marvel look in general ?
Was he simply in one of the stages of grief due to Conway the Destroyer lilling Gwen?
AMAZING ADVENTURES 23 was my first Killraven comic. I thought Happy Herb’s clean, no-fuss artwork made a good counter-point to Dandy Don’s macho, pseudo-profound hyper-verbosity. Of course, Craig Russell’s art took the comic to the Next Level, but I still like those earlier McGregor/Trimpe collaborations a lot. Can’t tell if it’s mostly Nostalgia talking but I think that cover is BOSS.
I was SO into Marvel’s monster books! Sadly, I think the covers are by far the best things about Dracula’s crossovers with the Werewolf and Frankenstein. The stories themselves are disappointing.
Same with SUBBY 69. Great cover, “Meh” comic.
b.t.
Charlie, I think there comes a point in every fan’s life when the Shock of the New wears off, the bloom is off the rose, and things just sort of start to suck.
I was 12 when these books were published and I’d been rabidly reading and collecting comics for just a few short months. So I thought even the crappy books were pretty cool! And the “good” ones were f***ing AMAZING. Everything at that time was still shiny and new and exciting. Each trip to the spinner racks at Smith’s Food King and Michael’s Liquor held the promise of new wonders to behold. It was a magical time.
By the end of 1974, I started getting the nagging feeling that it was just OVER. I was still buying lots of comics but I seemed to be enjoying them less.
Titles like CONAN THE BARBARIAN and AMAZING SPIDER-MAN and TOMB OF DRACULA were still “good” but I felt like they were kind of in a rut, that maybe the creative teams were coasting just a bit. THE AVENGERS, CAPTAIN AMERICA, SWAMP THING, I felt like those books had definitely peaked.
But it’s all relative. You at least had 3 good years of New Fan excitement! I’m kinda jealous . But those early “puppy love” endorphins just don’t last forever…
b.t.
Steve, I read a few of the Marvel horror black & whites online not so long ago - after you included Monsters Unleashed in this very feature in fact - so I can apprise you of the following about Tales of the Zombie #4:
'James Bond Meets Baron Samedi' was just an article by Don McGregor about the 'Live And Let Die' flick, with a couple of spot illos by Pablo Marcos. Basically its a complaint that the film wasn't like the book, and how Roger Moore was a rubbish Bond compared to Connery. Frankly, I found it disappointing that Dauntless Don was an Ian Fleming fan, rather than the sophisticated philosopher/aesthete au fait with Proust and Joyce I had once imagined him to be (back when Killraven and the Black Panther got my youthful endorphins going).
In the main story 'The Law and Phillip Bliss', by Steve Gerber and Pablo Marcos, Katanya was a manbo - a voodoo priestess - who didn't wear much. It made absolutely no sense why she was trying to kill the zombie Simon Garth (who was already dead anyway) not even if you were familiar with the ongoing storyline from previous issues, which I had the misfortune to be.
It fails dismally because despite being set in Haiti theres no attempt to understand, let alone convey anything at all about the culture, or voodoo as a belief system. The locals are just a sinister exotic 'other', who don't behave rationally. I found it all quite objectionable actually.
Of course the terrible writing doesn't help either. When the action suddenly shifts to N'Warlins for part 2, where some random fella, the titular Mr Bliss, has found the medallion that controls the zombie and summons him from the Caribbean to attack divorce lawyers in the US - because... women, eh? - I gave up on the rest of the mag.
-sean
b.t.- We are on the same page regarding that Sub-Mariner issue! I was so totally stoked at the time; just starting out and grabbing anything with Spider-Man in it. And as you noted, what a cover! Unfortunately the epic battle was more a short story. Kept that book for years; not to read but just to admire that Romita cover.
Also, I'd agree that there is a certain initial time frame when all those comics just blow you away. Charlie made it three years. I was obsessed for a couple years; 74 and 75- right thru the "Giant-Size" era. While I continued to buy, collect and read for many years after, the 'sparkle' was a bit faded.
Which actually poses a little question: are there any comics , books, films, tv or whatever that can arouse a bit of that youthful enthusiasm now? I can truly say that there are flashes. When I first read Don Rosa's "Life and Times of Scrooge McDuck", it prompted me to start snagging anything 'Ducky'by Rosa or Barks. which I continue to do even now (just read a Barks tale last night: "The Horseradish Treasure"- wonderful)...
Well, Redartz, I had a second comic book endorphin rush about ten years on from '73 - '76, in the early to mid 80s. Its been a while since an actual new comic really sparkled for me though. I think the most recent was Punisher: Soviet.
I know, I know - the Punisher, Garth Ennis... what is wrong with me?
Steve, in WOTW were all humans slaves under the Martians? I don't think so, because in Amazing Adventures #23 Sabre says he was paid by the Martians to do stuff like capturing Killraven. So clearly there was some kind of capitalist economy on
Earth as well as slavery, otherwise what would be the point of earning money if there was nowhere to spend it?
But then, where were the shops in the apocalyptic future of er, 2018...?
Any thoughts, b.t.?
-sean
Steve, in addition to the March 1974 comics we've already discussed, I also bought:
ADVENTURE 432 — 2nd Spectre story — formula hadn’t begun wearing too thin yet— AWESOME cover
CAPTAIN MARVEL 31 - Starlin kicking cosmic ass
CREATURES ON THÉ LOOSE 28 — Thongor drawn by Vicente Alcazar — I like it.
KA-ZAR 2 - good Romita cover, decent Heck/Abel art
MAN-THING 3– The Foolkiller! Good Mayerik/Abel art
MARVEL TEAM-UP 19 — Spidey and Ka-Zar
MARVEL TRIPLE ACTION 17 - really nice Heck/Romita art
MARVEL TWO-IN-ONE 2 - Thing and Subby
MARVEL’S GREATEST COMICS 48 — Ronan the Accuser!
SWAMP THING 9 - penultimate Wrightson ish
I didn’t buy any Charltons that month either.
b.t.
Bt, that's a healthy pile of comic book goodness.
Sean, that is a very good point about the lack of shops in post-apocalyptic societies. Also, thanks for the Tales of the Zombie info.
Red and bt, I would say 1972-1976 was my period of peak comic book enthusiasm.
Charlie, I didn't get The Shadow #2 because I never found a copy of it. I didn't stumble across any Shadow issues until the Frank Robbins era. They and the ER Cruz tales were easy to find.
For the record, I can confirm that I did get have any Charltons this month either.
I did get the following:
DCs:
Batman #255 - a 100 Page Giant, which had a (then) new lead drawn by Neal Adams. Which means the Batman and Wolfman met the same month as Dracula and Werewolf By Night. Some coincidence, eh?
Tarzan #229
Weird War Tales #23
Sadly, I did not see Kamandi #15 on sale anywhere ):
Marvels:
Marvel Spotlight #14 - how is it that a comic gets worse when Steve Gerber takes over the writing from Gary Friedrich?
Marvel Premiere #14 - ooh, Dr Strange by Steve Englehart and Frank Brunner. Nice.
FF #144 - eh.
-sean
*did NOT have any Charltons
You wouldn't guess that I actually re-read that before posting, would you? Duh.
-sean
'Live & Let Die' inspired Moon Knight # 6, too. 'From Russia With Love' influenced Marvel more (probably) - but LALD's a close second.
Many Killravens I have - but that one's sadly missing.
Nevertheless, it looks interesting!
Sean - Your Marvels all start '14' - eerie!
Phillip
Red, BT, et al.
I suppose Charlie was lucky to have a good 3-year run in comics. And it was a very dynamic, transitional period which might have kept me hanging on. I probably was at the sweet spot of comics / Marvel-mania
There simply were not that many stories published yet. Spidey, FF had not reached 100 issues.
The old artists were still around. And there were plenty (!) of reprints to catch up with. (Even 50 years ago, Marvel is running 5 reprint titles monthly?)
There were new characters being developed like Luke Cage, Iron Fist who managed to hang around (unlike our beloved Dingbats).
The nostalgia wave was kicking in: the Invaders (Avengers 97), Cap 144 (more Caps and Buckys!), the Shadow, Steranko's History of Comics, the 100-page DC reprints.
DC had started getting some of its stuff together like Aparo on Brave and Bold and especially the Spectre. And they had had the famous works by Adams only a few years earlier.
Anyhow... It was a great time to be a comic reader but there is a time where the "bloom is off the rose," a certain sameness is perceived and at that age we are maturing and developing other interests.
I mean, I was also hanging up the banana-seat bike for a 10 speed and had stopped sticking baseball cards in the spokes, lol.
Red- good question about if other books, later in life, brought back that original "Comics are the greatest thing ever" feel!
Need to get that into one of Steve's "open-mic" days! I have had a few retro periods. To name a few:
American Flagg by Chaykin.
Byrne's FF run which I only read about 5-6 years ago thanks to yours and others recommendations here.
Sean, McGregor did an epic takedown of MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN in DEADLY HANDS OF KUNG FU too. One choice bit of Roger Moore-bashing that I remember: he went on at length about how unconvincing Roger’s fight scenes were, especially in the martial arts sequences. The term ‘awkward Kung Fu’ has stayed with me all these years. I hadn’t really noticed it before, but he was right! Roger really couldn’t throw a convincing punch if his life depended on it.
b.t.
Roger Moore was unconvincing on screen at everything, b.t.
-sean
So…have any ‘recent’ comics, movies, TV shows, books, etc given me the same kind of ‘Nerd High’ that those first few months of Comic Collecting did? Not really, no.
My passion for comics waxed and waned over the decades but eventually just died, I regret to say. I still appreciate comics as an art form and still get a big kick out of the ‘Good Old Stuff’ (obviously!) but I eventually got to the point where I was still visiting the comic shop every week and more often than not leaving empty-handed. Then I just stopped going. I honestly can’t remember the last ‘new’ comic I bought. It was probably ten years ago now.
Even though my obsessive passion for comics started its long, slow fade around 1975, I did still retain my youthful ‘Sense of Wonder’ well into my thirties. Just last week we were talking about Star Trek, and I mentioned how it ignited my love for Sci-Fi/Fantasy/Horror. I was a big Stephen King fan for awhile and I ADORED the first two STAR WARS movies and RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK. Thomas Harris’ first two Hannibal Lecter books blew me away (I still think they’re brilliant). I enjoyed most of David Lynch’s movies (and TWIN PEAKS too). Etc. None of these things QUITE fired my imagination as those mid-1970s comics had, but some came pretty close.
In more recent years, I can still enjoy movies and various TV shows but the ones that have that ‘Extra Special Something’ are pretty rare. I have to admit, some of the Marvel movies have tickled my Nerd Bone pretty hard. I really like the first two Captain America pictures — WINTER SOLDIER is probably the ‘better’ of the two but the first one engages my inner 12-year-old more directly (and I still get choked up when Steve ditches the Flying Wing in the Arctic). And I fell for all the AVENGERS:ENDGAME fan-service. Swear to God, watching that thing on opening weekend on a big screen in a packed house (sitting next to a mom and her two enthusiastic kids) was one of the best movie-going experiences I’ve ever had. But I don’t think I’ve seen any of the ones that followed it, and I definitely haven’t seen any of the TV mini-series.
TV-wise, I thought SUCCESSION pretty much lived up to the hype. Trying to think of other recent shows that were at that level, but I’m kinda drawing a blank….
b.t.
Roger Moore was not exactly the man's man when it came to 007, unlike Sean Connery. Not sure why he was chosen for the role in the first place.
Regardless, the mighty Chicago Museum of Science and Industry, home to the U-505 German WWII submarine, has just opened an exhibit on the Devices of James Bond.
Me and the missus plan to check this out during spring break end of March. (Red - if you are a Bond geek and coming this way for Chicago Con in August (?), you may want to leave a little extra time?)
I liked Marvel's version of Frankenstein monster! (as depicted above)
Particularly his showdown with Dracula. I went nuts when I read that.
Hey, I was a little kid. Didn't we all love classic monsters back then?
...and I still do!
M.P.
I've always assumed that Roger Moore was offered the role of Bond because he'd played The Saint on TV in the '60s and The saint was sort of Bond-like.
I'm reminded of the impressionist Alistair McGowan doing his version of Roger Moore:
"My agent asked me if I'd like to play the important part of Bond - I replied I was willing to play all of him".
To be fair to Roger Moore, at least his name was a bit of a double entendre which seems fitting for someone playing Bond.
-sean
I don’t know if was just P.R. spin but when LIVE AND LET DIE was first released there was a lot of talk that Moore had been offered the 007 role before Connery was, but had to turn it down because he was doing The Saint. But I don’t think the dates really work.
M.P. — I like the second half of the Frankenstein / Dracula crossover (in FRANKENSTEIN 10) better than the first. My main complaint is that I think the color choices could be moodier, it’s a little too bright overall.
Sean, re: Steve Gerber Vs Gary Friedrich on SON OF SATAN — I once read that Gerber thought it was some of his best work. I thought it was solid enough, but not really exceptional. He may have been a ‘better’ writer overall than Friedrich, but in this instance I agree with you. For better or worse, Friedrich’s work generally had a wildly melodramatic feel, with little regard for rationality or coherent plot logic. Plus, his characterizations always seemed to be ‘turned up to eleven’, which was certainly appropriate for Damon Hellstrom. In Friedrich’s hands, The Satanson seemed to be genuinely dangerous and unpredictable, like he could explode with demonic fury at any given moment. Friedrich didn’t bother to make him ‘likeable’ . Yeah, I liked his version better too.
b.t.
b.t.
That bit where the Son of Satan softly (and inappropriately!) strokes Roxanne Simpson’s hair and then brutally YANKS on it, pulling her head painfully backward to maker her talk — holy crap, it was shocking to see a comic book ‘hero’ acting like that in a comic book back in the day. It’s STILL shocking, all these years later!
b.t.
Post a Comment