Thanks to Charlie Horse 47 and Killdumpster for their sponsorship of this post, via the magic of Patreon.
***
It must have seemed like nothing but fear was waiting to greet those who foolishly entered a cinema in October 1974.
For those who wanted less uncanny fare, it also saw the unveiling of The Taking of Pelham One Two Three, Benji, Airport 1975, The Odessa File, Stardust and The Four Musketeers.
Meanwhile, Vayla's Brotherhood of Baal has kidnapped Lissa Russell and plans to sacrifice her, for some reason I'm not aware of.
But, of course, that can only lead to a scrap between the two monsters, with the only winner being the reader!
Having said that, it only takes thirty pages for them to do so.
And that means we then get a reprint of the tale in which Spider-Man must audition for the Avengers by trying to capture the Hulk on their behalf.
It's true. Marvel's latest mag hits its second issue with the second instalment of its adaption of the movie we all love.
But that's not all. Within these pages, we also find Part Two of Terror on the Planet of the Apes, as brought to us by Mike Ploog and Doug Moench.
And there are text articles too, dealing with such themes as The City of the Apes, Simian Genesis and Michael Wilson: the "Other" Apes Writer.
Presumably, by the same method whereby there are about eight different characters called the Destroyer in the Marvel universe.
However, the other Power Man thinks otherwise - and that means Luke's going to have to fight him for the title.
Sadly, I've never read this one and can shed no illumination upon its contents but suspect that both men are still very much alive and well at the end of it all.
Regardless, that's then followed by a Joe Maneely reprint the world can only refer to as The Two-Faced Man.
Apparently, it features characters blessed with such names as Ezekial Tork, Maybelle Tork and Dawg.
This time, it's aimed at younger readers and tells us just how the ordinary everyday Peter Parker became the hero we all know and respect.
But that's not all because, in this issue, he gets to meet the Spoiler, Electro, the Vulture and, erm... ...Duane.
Granted, he's not that new because the main story's a reprint from 1967.
School teacher Carter Slade's on his way to a new job when he encounters a gang attacking a family. Attempting to stop them, he's almost killed but is saved when a man called Flaming Star, believing him to be a promised white warrior, gives him some stardust that enables him to become the Night Rider.
Gives him some, "stardust," you say?
The issue's backup tale is a reprint from 1957, doesn't seem to feature either Night Rider or stardust and is called The Walking Target!
Elsewhere, a 1954 reprint sees the Sub-Mariner tackle the mystery of people who disappear when they fall into the sea.
The 1950s Black Knight, meanwhile, has an adventure which seems to involve Arthur Pendragon.
And Dr Strange goes Beyond the Purple Veil, thanks to Stan Lee and Steve Ditko.
The cover, meanwhile, is painted by someone credited as JAD.
26 comments:
Lucas Cage Hero for Hire. Period. Fighting it out with the original Power Man in a movie theatre was sort of interesting… but not really.
Cover of Nick Fury Agent of SHIELD # 6 is the best. 4 is more “stylish” but styles come and go. Would a 15 to 20 year old, today, be gobsmacked by # 6 like we were 55 years ago??? But # 6 is eternal.
Would a 15 year old, today, be gobsmacked by stylish # 4 today??? Idk… but # 6 (space cover) is eternal!
Charlie!
I like THE FOUR MUSKETEERS but it’s quite a bit more serious than THE THREE MUSKETEERS, therefore not as much fun. I also like THE TAKING OF PELHAM 123 a lot and have seen PHANTOM OF THE PARADISE so many times, I’ve lost count.
b.t.
“JAD” was Spanish artist Josep Antonio Domingo, who painted just a handful of covers for Marvel and Skywald (and none for Warren, I think) but was extremely prolific in the European markets, producing covers for horror comics like DOSSIER NEGRO, fiction digests like VAMPIR HORROR-ROMAN, PROFESSOR ZAMORRA and DAMONENKILLER, and science fiction and sword and sorcery covers for assorted paperback publishers in the UK and USA. I like that ultra-lurid VAMPIRE TALES cover a lot — in fact, I think that whole issue is pretty solid.
Much as I appreciated having Ploog on PLANET OF THE APES and MAN-THING, it’s a shame he couldn’t have drawn the Frankenstein/Werewolf By Night punch-up in GIANT-SIZE WEREWOLF 2. Or even better, Tom Sutton — that would have been amazing! But really, almost anyone would have been preferable to Perlin/Colletta. Yes, I’m still holding a grudge, 50 years later.
I love that Blade/Morbius battle in FEAR. The story is kinda goofy, but amusing (Morbius thinks Blade is a delusional psycho for believing that “real”vampires like Dracula exist) and the Russell/Abel art is dynamic and stylish.
I wonder what movie that poster in the background of Romita’s SPIDEY SUPER STORIES cover is supposed to be for? Whatever it is, it’s kinda hilarious.
b.t.
This month's awesome Planet Of The Apes cover was of course also the cover of POTA #1 in the UK.
I only watched Texas Chainsaw Massacre ‘properly’ recently. I went to see it for the first time in 1991 when I was a first year student; at a different university‘s film club screening all the way across the other side of London in sub-optimal conditions (16mm print, noisy students union etc). I finally got round to watching it again on Blu-ray and boy it’s good.
Shamefully, I have never seen Phantom of the Paradise - not a huge DePalma or glam kitsch fan - though a growing middle-age appreciation of Paul Williams might tip me over the edge soon.
Actually I haven’t seen Cars That Ate Paris or It’s Alive either despite their cult status. Should I make a special effort? Again only a passing appreciation of Larry Cohen, much diminished by his pathetic Alan Moore-implicating lawsuit around League of Extraordinary Gentlemen.
I am a fan of Stardust though it lives better in memory than as an actual viewing experience. I quite like Pelham 123 as well, though I think it’s just a bit overrated.
Bt, thanks for the JAD info.
What, no Savage Sword of Conan #2, Steve? That was the one with 'Black Colussus', the first outing for the awesome Buscema/Alcala team, making it by quite a long way the best Marvel publication this month.
Tbh I'm not sure why the mag isn't in the Fifty Year Ago feature given than its a second Conan title, but hey - your blog, your rules.
Fear #24 is a strange comic - and yes, I do realize thats a bit of a redundant thing to say about an issue of Gerber's Morbius - as it starts off as way out science fiction set on Arcturus IV, with weird aliens and android barbarians, stylishly drawn by a young Craig Russell, who's finally becoming recognizable as Craig Russell by this point (I think his first Killraven came out the next month).
Which is not at all what you expect from that standard 'Marvel horror' cover.
Then it suddenly changes up, cutting to Blade taking out a vampire in New York... when a spaceship crashes in front of him - only in comics! - and he deduces from the puncture marks on the dead Arcturian Lord I's neck that Morbius is an alien vampire. A not unreasonable assumption under the circumstances - even if it is wrong - thats amusing as a counterpoint to Morbius thinking Blade is delusional.
The moral of the story is of course never go anywhere with Morbius, as he has a tendency to bite and drain the blood of anyone nearby, even if he's got to know them fairly well, like Lord I. Or Amanda Saint.
Its somewhat surprising b.t. didn't mention that Morbius also appeared as the star of the lead feature in Vampire Tales #7, "Where Is Gallows Bend And What The Hell Am I Doing There?" Written by - as you might guess from the too long story title - Don McGregor, disappointing everyone in the off month between the latest Amazing Adventures and Jungle Action.Even back when I was young enough to think Dauntless Don was a literary titan and comic book messiah, his Morbius was always the puzzling disappoinment next to Killraven and the Black Panther.
Mind you, in fairness I saw the first half hour or so of the Morbius film on tv the other evening, and even re-reading the McGregor version would have been an improvement.
-sean
I have a vague recollection that Stardust was ok, but I'm inclined to agree with Matthew that thats a point of view that probably wouldn't survive seeing it again. Its hard to think of any rock music film thats actually any good.
By far the best of the films mentioned here - that I've seen anyway - is The Four Musketeers. I really like both that and Three Musketeers. Sure, Michael York, Raquel Welch, Oliver Reed, Faye Dunaway...how 70s can you get? But I think they hold up fairly well, for what they are?
I remember seeing them as a kid and bring surprised that Raquel got killed off, and by the lads having de Winter executed. Faithful to Dumas of course, but still not what you expected. Surprisingly dark.
Although not as dark as the third one years later, killing off Roy Kinnear...
-sean
Apologies for going on, but can I just add a quick shout for Giant-Size Defenders #2? Fairly average so far as Len Wein's story goes, but great Gil Kane/Klaus Janson artwork.
-sean
Sean - have you seen the fairly recent 'Her Smell' with Elizabeth Moss?
And surely Spinal Tap is a good rock movie?
Steve, all of Marvel's POTA strips are available to read online at the Hunter's POTA website and while looking at George Tuska's art for the adaptation of the '68 film I was amused how Taylor was the spitting image of Brian Blessed in some panels!
Yeah, Spinal Tap is quite good Matthew. I suppose I tend to think of it more as a comedy... but of course it is about rock music. So I should really have specified dramas.
You'd think it would be a good subject for films or a 'great novel' - all those larger than life characters, the way it was emblematic of an era - but it doesn't seem to have been in practice.
Can't comment on Her Smell as I haven't seen it. The only one one I can think of is - possibly a controversial choice - The Doors. And I'm not even into the band.
Maybe I'm just a sucker for Oliver Stone flicks. I even liked Alexander.
So far as novels go, there's always The Great Rock'n'Roll Swindle by Michael Moorcock.
I am of course joking there.
-sean
sean — I didn’t mention the McGregor/Sutton Morbius story in VAMPIRE TALES 7 because I seem to remember we’ve already discussed it here at SDC in a thread tangent, months ago. But, to reiterate: yes, the story is a surrealistic mess, Sutton’s art is nice — on the whole, I like the McGregor / Sutton team’s previous Morbius story in VAMPIRE TALES 4 much more.
Steve Gerber’s Morbius series in FEAR isn’t really any better — as you suggest, it’s just One Damn Thing After Another, with Morbius bouncing from one bizarre Comic Book Sci-Fi scenario to another, seemingly without any purpose. The next issue is kinda fun as Doug Moench tries to wrap up the whole hap-hazard, willy-nilly, borderline incoherent storyline in one 17-page installment.
b.t.
And I agree that SAVAGE SWORD 2 is the outstanding title of the month. The first Buscema/Alcala Conan epic is spectacular, I love the Blackmark installment by Gil Kane, the Englehart/Chaykin/Crusty Bunkers Kull story is nothing special but acceptable, the Neal Adams cover is cool and even the inside front cover illo by a young Mike Zeck looks really nice.
b.t.
A few more October 74 stragglers that I think deserve mention:
MARVEL SPOTLIGHT: first half of a straight-up EXORCIST-knockoff story by Gerber and Colan. Frank Chiaramonte’s inks are a bit sloppy on this installment — Mike Esposito’s inks on Part 2 (next issue) are actually better.
RED CIRCLE SORCERY 9 — “If I Were King” is a pretty ho-hum story but it features stunning art by Alex Toth.
THE SHADOW 7 — Frank Robbins. I like it a lot.
b.t.
Iain Banks’s ‘Espedair Street’ is a not bad rock novel. A Fleetwood Mac surrogate band and the aftermath of their mega-stardom. One of his very good early books.
1974....best year ever for comics!(Yes I have said it before and I know I was aged 11/12 but it was fantastic!)For some reason those Giant Size comics blew me away.The quality was all over the place but I would have bought them for the covers alone,it really did not matter what the interiors were like.Perhaps the fact that they were all non-distributed added to their allure,though my friend Martin managed to buy GS Spiderman #1 vs Dracula off a spinner rack!How it came to be there still baffles me as Marvel was only importing certain titles with 'Marvel All colour' bannered across the front of every comic.Thought there would be Giant Size Marvels for ever and they only lasted 1 year to 18 months.Sad, but considering Marvel never had a problem with Dreaded Deadlines under Stan Lee, perhaps it was a blessing in disguise as the amount of reprints increased dramatically until Jim Shooter sorted it out!Great post my friend.
Matthew, when I finally got around to watching TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE in my early 30s, I thought it lived up to its reputation as an intensely scary movie and was also surprised that there was actually very little on-screen gore. But the murders are staged for maximum shock value. I re-watched it a few years ago and found the relentless unpleasantness a bit too much to “enjoy”. I guess I’m getting kinda squeamish in my old age…
b.t.
This was a great year and a great month for Marvel!
A lotta Halloween stuff goin' on.
I liked Morbius, I 've got those issues of Adventure into Fear, but I think he was a hard character to write.
There's not a lot there. Scientist experiments on himself, it goes bad.
Not as interesting as Dracula, which lasted for what, 60 issues?
Still, Morbius added to the spooky vibe of early 70's Marvel Comics.
It was the zeitgeist! A spooky time, Satanism, the occult, Allice Cooper, Sasquatch, etc.
All I know is I was six years old and I had my head on a swivel the whole time, I was sure something was going to get me.
M..P..
The weird thing is that Morbius - like Man-Wolf - was created to bypass Comic Code restrictions on vampires and werewolves. Yet they still got their own series even though by then Marvel were able to do Tomb of Dracula and Werewolf By Night.
For that matter theres still an evilish Satannish putting in an appearance even though there was now a Son of Satan was around... in the same comic!
b.t., Yeah, we have gone into McGregor's Morbius before. But discussing Dauntless Don never gets old around here.
That was a fair point about the Gerber version being in its own way just as aimless, but I still prefer his surreal SF/fantasy/horror mash-up version anyway. Although generally that approach worked better in his Man-Thing comics.
Er, not that the issue here - #10 - is a particularly good example, but I already slagged off the first part of the story last month.
-sean
FF follower, by all accounts Marvel was very chaotic between the Lee and Shooter regimes, with the editor-in chief position changing pretty rapidly in the mid-70s.
But I think that was a big part of what made the comics interesting in years like 1974, even if it did also give us Dreaded Deadline Doom reprints. You have to take the rough with the smooth!
-sean
Morbius, for me, came later (Dec 77/Jan 78). Morbius's run-ins with both Spidey & a weird character, called 'The Empathoid', who turned intangible, a bit like the Vision, were puzzling. Aged 8, missing one instalment, that story/character's point eluded me, I'm afraid. Nevertheless, Morbius seemed as strong as Spidey (at least ) - which certainly impressed me, as a kid. Later, in 'Forces in Combat', I read reprints of the Lord I business.
Phillip
Agreed with' taking the rough with the smooth' in respect of mid to late 70's Marvels and of course I loved Marvel comics and bought every comic I could find.....reprints never bothered me but ,looking back, Marvel must have been in a perpetual state of flux.An amazing time for diversification and trying different themes and characters but Stan Lee would not have tolerated the mess that was created.Regardless of recent stories about Lee, he appeared to me as an excellent editor who ran a tight ship that produced the 1st 10 years of Marvel comics which ,for me, is the best of the best comics ever!!(with the exception of Neal Adams Batman!!).
In fairness to Stan's successors as Editor-in-Chief, Jim, I think they generally had a heavier workload than he did because of the way Marvel expanded in the early 70s. Roy Thomas for instance got the job in '72, which I believe was just as Marvel overtook DC as the biggest comic publisher.
Conversely, by the time Shooter took over the line, it was starting to contract... Although you have to give it to him that he does seem to have had more of an aptitude for the position than the others. Or at least that he was more willing to be unpopular (an important skill for an editor).
-sean
I recall the title, and... Frozen Gold? Was that what the band were called? I don't remember ever reading anything by Banks that I thought was terrible at the time, but it didn't make much of an impression on me either.
Its been quite a while, but I think I generally preferred Banks when he used the 'M'.
-sean
Post a Comment