Sunday, 29 September 2024

Tigon. The horror the world ignored.

Thanks to Charlie Horse 47 and Killdumpster for their sponsorship of this post, via the magic of Patreon
***

The Blood on Satan's Claw, movie poster
A
crueller man than I once remarked that if Amicus was the poor man's Hammer, Tigon was the poor man's Amicus.

He was, of course, completely wrong.

Well, admittedly, he wasn't completely wrong.

However, there was far more to Tigon than being doomed to dwell in the shadow of two other content creators.

Tigon was a British film production company founded by the splendidly named Tony Tenser, way back in the dark days of 1966 and it quickly made a name for itself as a purveyor of the kind of horror that all sensible people avoided.

It never achieved the National Treasure status of Hammer nor the quirky distinctiveness of Amicus and it was never in danger of winning the Queen's Award to Industry that the former company had but it did bestow upon us a string of chillers that are strangely difficult to forget. And at least two of those proved to be pivotal in the history of British and, even, world horror.

But just what kinds of triumphs did Tigon present to us during its seven year history?

Doomwatch movie poster
Doomwatch
, a kind of Wicker Man for people who like common sense solutions. 

The Beast in the Cellar in which Beryl Reid and Flora Robson shared their house with a spectacularly unfriendly brother.

The Crimson Altar brought together Boris Karloff, Christopher Lee, Michael Gough, Barbara Steele and future Coronation Street serial killer Mark Eden for a tale of witchcraft that promised to be far better than it actually was.

On the other hand, The Creeping Flesh united Christopher Lee and Peter Cushing to pleasing effect in the tale of a man who acquires a mysterious skeleton with a penchant for finger removal.

The Sorcerers brought Catherine Lacey, Boris Karloff and Ian Ogilvy together for the tale of an ageing couple who take possession of a young man and force him to do terrible things.

The Blood Beast Terror saw UFO star - and mother of Benedict Cumberbatch - Wanda Ventham as a woman who habitually became a giant homicidal moth in a film that, it has to be said, bore more than a passing resemblance to the far more popular Hammer film The Reptile which had materialised a couple of years earlier.

And there was more than even that. Among Tigon's other films were For the Love of Ada, Au Pair Girls, Neither the Sea Nor the Sand, Hannie Caulder, The Magnificent Seven Deadly Sins, Virgin Witch, The Body Stealers, What's Good for the Goose, The Haunted House of Horror, 1917, Monique, Zeta One, Black Beauty, Love in Our Time and Mini Weekend.

The more astute reader will have guessed that not all of those were horror films. Not even Black Beauty.

Witchfinder General, movie poster
But perhaps the company's two most important offerings were Witchfinder General and The Blood on Satan's Claw. The former being a highly fictionalised account of the work of Matthew Hopkins, as played by Vincent Price, with the second being a study of what happens to a small rural community when the skull of a mystery creature is unearthed.

Both films are set in the same milieu, occur around the time of the English Civil War and involve accusations of witchcraft. However, while the former makes it clear there are no supernatural happenings and the only evil exists in the hearts of men, the latter makes it clear the supernatural is very much present and eagerly warping the minds of teenagers.

Together, these two films form two limbs of the three-legged milking stool which is often credited with being the very foundation of the genre known as British Folk Horror. The other being the previously mentioned Wicker Man which Tigon had no involvement in. Both Witchfinder General and The Blood on Satan's Claw share a nihilism that would probably have had Hammer running a mile and are genuinely uncomfortable watches in a way that Hammer's more flamboyant fare never was.

So, which is my favourite of Tigon's movies?

I do have a fondness for The Creeping Flesh and seem to be the only person alive who enjoys The Blood Beast Terror. Witchfinder General is, of course, highly regarded.

But I have to go for The Blood on Satan's Claw in appreciation of its total lack of traditional narrative structure and refusal to have anything that genuinely qualifies as a protagonist. These factors are often cited as critical flaws but they lend the piece the feeling of a fly on the wall documentary, as though a film crew has, somehow, turned up in an 18th Century village and started filming what's going on without being totally sure what's going on. As one who appreciates those who eschew story-telling convention, I find this a more interesting approach than if the tale had had the sense to follow the rules.

You may of course, disagree with me.

On the other hand, you might not have a clue what I'm talking about. In which case, should you wish to know more about Tigon and its output, the studio's, admittedly not exhaustive, Wikipedia page can be found by clicking this very link.

27 comments:

Anonymous said...

Tigon’s horror output was such that you can’t say they ever had an identifiable “style” the way you could usually spot a Hammer or Amicus movie from a mile away. I like THE CREEPING FLESH quite a bit — strangely, it almost feels like a Hammer/Amicus hybrid, with Freddie Francis directing and its Lee/Cushing dynamic reminding me of movies like THE SKULL and THE GORGON. The way it equates female sexuality with !!!EVIL!!! is hopelessly sexist and outdated, but I still think it’s an effectively atmospheric horror film.

You pretty much nailed THE CRIMSON CULT / CURSE OF THE CRIMSON ALTAR. It’s almost mind-boggling how a horror movie starring Christopher Lee, Boris Karloff and Barbara Steele (with a storyline swiped from Lovecraft’s “Dreams In The Witch House”) could be such a dud.

I respect WITCHFINDER GENERAL more than I actually like it. It’s just a bit too downbeat and grim for me. But I do love that dynamic “Epic” logo treatment in the poster, as if it’s a Charlton Heston movie or something :D

Also, I don’t buy into the canonization of Writer/Director Michael Reaves as some kind of brilliant Horror Auteur Who Died Way Too Young, but I do like THE SORCERERS — I prefer it to WITCHFINDER GENERAL, honestly.

BLOOD ON SATAN’S CLAW is pretty great. Am I mis-remembering, or wasn’t its weird story structure due to its originally being planned as an Amicus-style portmanteau of unconnected stories? Anyhow, it’s creepy as hell.

b.t.

Steve W. said...

Bt, you're correct. The Blood on Satan's Claw was going to be three stories built around one central theme but they ended up being patched together into one longer tale with the joins barely concealed.

Anonymous said...

The abruptly shifting storylines in BLOOD ON SATAN’S CLAW confused the hell out of me first time I saw it. Made for a very odd, disorienting experience. Watched it again maybe ten years later and was able to roll with it much more easily.

b.t.

Colin Jones said...

I was listening to Brain Of Britain on Radio 4 yesterday afternoon and there was a question about the Wicker Man (or more specifically Scotland's Wicker Man music festival which was named after the film).

Colin Jones said...

Steve, I never knew that Wanda Ventham was Dominic Cumberbatch's mother!!

Matthew McKinnon said...

I keep meaning to watch ‘Doomwatch’ but then I get sidetracked by whether I should watch some of the TV show first, and then cost implications take over and I shelve the idea.

BT - I don’t buy into the Cult Of Michael Reeves either.

The Sorcerers is kind of fun but pretty unexceptional, and I’ve always found Witchfinder General unengaging. I just don’t feel the magic other people seem to feel, so it’s hard for me to overlook all the bad aspects of it (dated looking hair and makeup, terrible day for night scenes, the general cheapness of the production).

On the basis of those two films it’s hard to go along with the Ian Curtis-like Poet Of Darkness rep he seems to have in certain circles.

I only watched Blood On Saran’s Claw recently and that too didn’t really match up to its colossal rep. I’ll give it another go at some point but I’m not really in a hurry.

Anonymous said...

Steve-

AAAAHHHHHHH!
...well that was my first thought when I saw that "Blood on Satan's Claw" poster.
I like a good horror movie, but, geez...
'Tis the season, with Halloween coming up.
About the Witchfinder General., I read that Vincent Price was drunk as a cross-eyed monkey for most of the production, falling off his horse and pissing everybody off, and in the final fight scene, the other actor was punching him for real, really laying into him.
I love Vincent Price, but hey, it is kinda funny.

M.P.

Steve W. said...

MP, I know Vincent Price didn't get on at all with the director who'd wanted Donald Pleasence for the role but was overruled by American International who'd put up a large part of the funding and viewed Price as being their go-to horror star. I can pass no comment on how he got on with the rest of the cast.

Matthew, I've never seen the Doomwatch TV show but it's never interfered with my experience when watching the film.

Colin Jones said...

A few years ago there was a play on Radio 4 about the making of Witchfinder General and in the play the film's director Michael Reeves calls Vincent Price a ham actor so Price storms off the set and has to be persuaded to carry on with the film and not resign. I don't know if this really happened.

Matthew McKinnon said...

If anyone is into the myth of Michael Reeves, there's a really good long essay about him in Iain Sinclair's book 'Lights Out For The Territory'.

Anonymous said...

Matthew, I have to agree with you about Blood On Satan's Claw. I actually saw it back in the day on late night TV, as the arse end of 70s turned into the 80s. Unlike the Wicker Man, it didn't stand out to me then as anything other than a run of the mill horror flick of its era, and I didn't see more in it much later either (sorry, Steve - often I agree with you, but not this time).

On Witchfinder General... I like the bleakness of it, but Ian Ogilvie is a deal breaker for me. Unfair I know, but thats how it is.
Had they cast someone else, I'd be more into it but not to the extent that I'd rate it with Wicker Man. I'm actually a bit dubious about the notion of 'British folk horror', and the retrospective creation of sub-genres generally that I don't think actually existed at the time.
Music journos started that kind of thing, and I reckon the notion of 'folk horror' was developed by analogy with the revival of interest in British folk-rock of the 70s that preceded it. You know, in the 90s when it became cool to be into Pentangle, and the rediscovery of the 'First Utterance' album by Comus led to articles about 'English wyrd-folk' and critics raving about other - supposedly similar - obscure records of the period, which turned out to be not at all as interesting.

Sorry if I wanted a bit there. Anyway, Wicker Man is just a singular film imo. In that sense, if anyone was looking for a contemporary film it has something in common with, I'd actually suggest Get Carter.

-sean

Anonymous said...

There’s a famous (probably apocryphal) anecdote about the Reeves / Price tensions. In the midst of an on-set row, Price sneers at the young director, “How dare you try to tell me what to do — I’ve made eighty films!” Reeves sneers back, “I’ve made three GOOD ones.” It makes for a good story, but the problem is, his first , THE SHE-BEAST is freaking terrible by almost any standard, so if we count THE SORCERERS as a “good” film, he really only had one completed good movie in his CV as he was making WITCHFINDER. But that wouldn’t be much of a mic-drop retort, so — “Print The Legend”.

b.t.

Anonymous said...

*Sorry if I ranted a bit there.

-sean

Anonymous said...

Also, not trying to be deliberately contrary, but I’ve always felt WICKER MAN was a bit over-rated. It’s good , but just doesn’t “wow” me. Last time I watched it was probably 30 years ago, and I never get the urge to re-visit it.

b.t.

Anonymous said...

Ah, but have you ever been to a Scottish island, b.t.?

Steve, I thought for a long time the best Tigon film was Hannie Caulder. Maybe it still is, but watching it yesterday after reading your post - its complete on Youtube if anyone's interested - it doesn't stand up as well as I'd hoped.

Partly because I'd forgotten Diana Dors turned up in it. But mainly because when I originally saw it on TV as a teenager, the woman as western (anti) hero was unusual and gave the film a distinctive, iconic quality it doesn't really have these days.
Raquel Welch will always be watchable though.

Has no-one else here seen Zeta One? Adaptated from a comic strip in Zeta, a psychedelic 60s British softcore magazine for gentlemen - yeah, really: think Men Only meets Oz - it stars Charles Hawtrey and Yutte Stensgaard.
Its gloriously terrible, and completely sexless in a way only that generation of Brits seemed to be able to manage. Not to be missed if you get the chance to see it.

-sean

Anonymous said...

Also not to be missed: the Liz Truss Q&A at the Tory party conference earlier today -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nYvs8ijFJU

What a shame she lost her seat and can't stand for party leader again.
I would love to see Liz4Leader 2...

-sean

Steve W. said...

Sean, I've seen the trailer for Zeta One but not the film. I'm absolutely convinced some of the costumes and wigs from it were recycled for Star Maidens.

Anonymous said...

I thought Star Maidens recycled props and costumes from Space: 1999, Steve.

Still, I supposed they could have used older ones from Zeta One too. They did re-use a plot element from it. And Dawn Addams.

-sean

Anonymous said...

Btw, Matthew - the Doomwatch film has been posted complete on Youtube. Although I don't remember it being that good, and unfortunately for the cost implications I think the tv version might be significantly better. At least if the couple of episodes I saw a while back were anything to go by.
One was about the army taking over a part of Yorkshire that had been used for a chemical warfare experiment - it amazed me that was actually broadcast in the early 70s, when stuff like Gruinard was still top secret.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gruinard_Island#Biological_warfare_testing

Although you do have to be willing to put up with the low budgets and dodgy BBC sets of the era.
It did seem to be an early 70s Dr Who for grown ups.

-sean

Colin Jones said...

Jimmy Carter is 100 years old today, the first US President to reach 100 and I think he's the first leader of ANY country ANYWHERE to reach 100, isn't he? In all of human history I don't think any other president, prime-minister, king, emperor or pope has ever reached 100 but I might be wrong!

Anonymous said...

Colin-
As far as I know. I always thought he was a good guy.
And I mean that. The guy had principles.
He didn't deserve to be blamed for inflation and gas prices. No one person controls that.

On the subject of horror movies, I just saw a trailer for the new remake of Nosferatu. Check it out!
Yikes. It creeped me out. That Bob Eggers guy makes wild-ass disturbing movies.
I'm gonna have to watch that.

M.P.

Anonymous said...

"We never dropped a bomb. We never fired a bullet."
Carter would maybe be remembered more fondly if he'd massacred a few people in a military intervention or somewhere. The Americans seem keen on that kind of thing - they get into almost as many wars as the Brits!
He's probably the only US President who didn't do anything like that. A bit of sanity... Good for him.

On the other hand, wasn't he into the Allmans?

-sean

Anonymous said...

Sean-

Yes he was. He and Greg Allman shared a few drinks together on his porch.
I'll give him points for that alone!

M.P.

Colin Jones said...

MP, Carter also believed strongly in environmentalism so he was well ahead of his time.

Colin Jones said...

A message from Carter is also included on the gold disc which was attached to Voyager 1 and 2 when they were launched in 1977. Those two discs contain sounds of Earth, everything from rainfall to languages to rock music, and they are intended to be found and played by an intelligent civilisation in the distant future (not very likely but anything's possible) so Carter's voice might be heard by aliens a billion years from now!

Anonymous said...

This one came around again quickly, Steve.

-sean

Steve W. said...

I'm determined to cash-in on the time of year, Sean.